Sharing A Radio Frequency Interface Resource

ABSTRACT

Applications may seek access to a radio frequency interface resource on a processor-based system that exceeds the available capacity of that resource. When more than one application needs access to an RF interface resource at the same time and the available capacity of the RF interface resource does not permit all these requests to be granted, contention resolution may be provided. In one embodiment, the contention resolution may involve determining the priority of each application seeking RF interface resource access and granting access based on that priority.

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.12/496,830, filed Jul. 2, 2009 and entitled “SHARING A RADIO FREQUENCYINTERFACE RESOURCE”, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 7,574,233,issued on Aug. 11, 2009 and entitled “SHARING A RADIO FREQUENCYINTERFACE RESOURCE,” the content all of which is hereby incorporated byreference.

BACKGROUND

This invention relates generally to radio frequency (RF) interfaceresources that provide access to media.

The phrase “RF interface resource” refers to the hardware and softwarecomponents of transmitters, receivers, and transceivers used byapplications to send or receive signals communicated over the radiofrequency range of the electromagnetic spectrum, or to process datacarried in those signals, or communicated through other means such asover a traditional data network or through a software interface. Thisdata can be in the form of audio, video, voice, data, or any combinationthereof. Examples of applications that use media carried over RF signalsinclude TV viewing, music radio listening, and voice/data communicationand exchange. RF signals may be carried over a variety of communicationslinks including over-the-air terrestrial sources, satellite sources, andwireless communications networks. In addition to being carried over RFfrequencies, data processed by RF interface resources may becommunicated in the form of packet-based data carried over traditionalcopper wire or optical fiber based data communications networks. Forexample, the data processed by an RF interface resource may becommunicated as signals over a television antenna, a DSL modem, a cablemodem, a coaxial cable TV connection. Alternatively, data processed byan RF interface resource, such as an MPEG-2 transport stream processedby a demultiplexer, may be carried as data communicated over a USBconnection, by a network interface card (NIC) or even through a softwareprogramming interface.

A personal computer (PC) may have a television (TV) add-in cardinstalled, which provides TV program viewing on the PC. In addition toviewing of TV as it is broadcast, many of today's newer cards providevideo cassette recorder-like functions such as recording TV programswhen aired for later viewing, using the hard disk for storage of theprogram. Some TV cards provide support for both analog and digitaltelevision viewing. Particularly with the advent of digital television,TV signals can also carry data services, in addition to normal TVprograms. Some examples of data service applications include thedelivery and download of movies, music, software, games, news, andInternet content. The applications receiving this content can becustomizable according to user preferences to only receive the contentthe user is interested in. Just like TV programs, these data servicesmay be scattered across many different RF frequencies or “TV channels.”

Conflicts arise between multiple applications wanting to tune todifferent TV channels at the same time. A TV program recordingapplication may want to tune to channel 3 to record a preselectedprogram, at the same time the user is watching TV with the TV viewerapplication on channel 5. At the same time, a PC games download serviceapplication might need to turn to channel 10 to get the game the userasked for. The first conflict in this example is over which applicationgets to tune the tuner to its channel. Even if the system had threeindependent tuners, each with its own demodulator and demultiplexer, asecond conflict could occur over the use of a common decoder needed toconvert protected or encrypted content into a form useable by eachapplication.

Because current systems allow each application to get direct access tothese resources, one application can interfere with the correctoperation of other applications, leaving the user clueless as to why aproblem occurred. For instance, the TV viewer application, because itlets the user change the TV channel whenever she wants to, may make itimpossible for the TV recording application to record desired programs,and the PC games service to successfully download a game (even thoughthe user has paid money for the service). Because of conflicts over theuse of these shared resources, the user is usually left completely inthe dark as to why the other applications fail (especially if they werethe reason why the user invested in a TV card to begin with). The resultis equally unsatisfying for data service providers and operators whodepend on content being successfully downloaded in order to collectrevenue.

Thus, there is a need for ways to resolve contention when the number ofactive applications requiring the use of an RF interface resourceexceeds the number of available RF interface resources.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is an operational depiction of one embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIG. 2 is a block depiction of one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a flow chart for software in accordance with one embodiment ofthe present invention;

FIG. 4 is a flow chart for software in accordance with anotherembodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 5 is a schematic illustration of a potential contention situationresolvable with one embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1, a platform may include one or more radio frequency(RF) interface resources, such as resources 100A and 100B, each coupledto a unidirectional or bi-directional communication link interface 102.Signals and data may be carried over a variety of communications linksincluding over-the-air terrestrial sources, satellite sources, wirelesscommunications networks, and copper wire or optical fiber based datacommunications networks. Examples of the communication link interface102 used by the RF interface resource to communicate the signals anddata it processes include: a television antenna, a DSL modem, a cablemodem, a coaxial cable TV connection, a USB connection, a networkinterface card (NIC) or an application programming interface API orother software interface mechanism to communicate data between the RFinterface resource 100 and a software program or the operating system.The resources 100A and 100B may be transmitters, receivers, ortransceivers, or the individual components thereof such as one or moreof the following: a tuner 104, an encoder 105, a decoder 105, amultiplexer 106, a demultiplexer 107, an encryptor 108, a decryptor 109,a modulator 110, and a demodulator 111.

The RF interface resources 100 may be coupled to an arbitration module32. The arbitration module 32 receives all requests for the resources100 from applications, such as the applications 30 a, 30 b, and 30 c,that are active on the platform. The arbitration module 32 controlsaccess to and from the radio frequency interface resource 100. In someembodiments, the arbitration module 32 may be a software component and,in some cases, it may be a portion of an operating system. Thearbitration module 32 may allow access to the resources 100 on aselective basis. The arbitration module 32 enforces a priority scheme todecide which application 30 is granted access to one or more RFinterface resources 100.

It should be understood that in some cases N resources may be accessibleto M applications where M is greater than N. Thus, contention may resultand the arbitration module 32 may be responsible for serving up accessto the N resources by the M applications according to a priority scheme.

Some embodiments of the present invention may support a multitude ofmedia services transmitted or received at different times and overdifferent radio frequencies, in an environment constrained by a limitednumber of RF interface resources.

Media, in the form of audio, video, voice or data, or any combinationthereof, can be communicated over signals carrying data. Examples of howsignals and data may be carried include over-the-air terrestrial orsatellite transmission, and copper wire or optical fiber networks. Anexample of a media service is the delivery of Video-On-Demandapplication where movie content is delivered in an MPEG-2 transportstream to a PC or Set top box for viewing Another example of a mediaservice is a rich multi-media Internet application where content isdelivered to a cell phone or personal digital assistant (PDA). Anotherexample of a media service is a gaming or software application wheregames or other software is delivered to a handheld or portable computer,a desktop PC, or a wireless appliance. Still another example is an MP3music or MPEG-4 video content is received on your mobile phone or PDA,or the reverse, where pictures captured and uploaded by your mobilephone or PDA are transmitted to someone else..

A variety of media services may be provided as a variety of RFfrequencies or “channels,” just as there are many television channelsfor TV programs. In fact, television programming is just another exampleof a media service, where the media is television programs, which aredelivered on a plurality of RF frequencies reserved for television. Inaddition to carrying television programs, those same television RFfrequencies can also be used to carry other media services like theVideo-On-Demand or other data services mentioned above. Unliketelevision programming in general though, media services need not bedelivered on continuous, 24×7 basis. Rather, some media services mayonly be available at particular time periods. This is frequently thecase for data services now being delivered over analog and digitaltelevision. Data content, which could include things like video, games,software, Internet, news, stock listings, etc, is often broadcast duringdiscrete, noncontiguous blocks of time throughout the day. Even wheredata services are broadcast on a continuous basis, data is usuallyrebroadcast repeatedly over a time period to ensure that the data getsreceived. Many media service applications tailor what content isactually received to match user preferences, meaning, some content isdeliberately skipped or ignored.

As an example, platforms, such as televisions, PCs, PDAs, or mobilephones phones, having only a single radio frequency tuner, can only betuned to a single radio frequency carrier at a time. In some cases, morethan one of a given type of RF interface resource is provided, but evenso, any given platform can only receive or transmit on a finite numberof radio frequencies at any given time, and be similarly restricted onthe number of data signals it can process simultaneously, as many as thenumber of give resources allow. In practice, the number of concurrentuses for RF interface resources will always exceed the number of RFinterface resources available in any practical system.

When services which use different RF frequencies attempt to operateconcurrently, conflicts may arise over the RF interface resource used toreceive or transmit content. Similar conflicts between applications mayarise over a particular resource, like an encoder or decoder used toprocess content for viewing, rendering, or play back, after it has beenreceived or before it will be transmitted. These conflicts may arisebecause more than one application may require the use of the same RFinterface resource at any given time. For example, three different dataservice applications may compete for the TV tuner, each wanting to tuneto its channel to receive its content. When the number of simultaneousrequests for resources exceeds the number of available RF interfaceresources, a problem arises.

In one embodiment, the contention resolution may involve determining thepriority of each application seeking RF interface resource access andgranting access based on that priority. Priority is the recognized rightto precedence of one application over another, for example by order ofurgency or importance. Priority may be assigned in any viable way. Insome embodiments, priority can be based on any number or combination offactors, including but not limited to: user preferences; whether anapplication is paid for or free; the order in which an applicationappeared, was selected or installed; when or where an application isavailable; whether an application is essential to the operation of thedevice; or whether an application requires other hardware or softwareresources that may or may not be present on the system. Priority may beassigned by the user, the application, or the system, or any combinationthereof, to mention a few examples.

Referring to FIG. 2, a processor-based RF reception platform 10 mayinclude a processor-based system 12. The system 12 may include the RFinterface resources 100 and the arbitration module 32 in one embodiment.The system 12 may be a personal computer, a set top box, a PDA, or amobile phone, to mention a few examples. The system 12 may be coupled toan output device 16, such as a display system, such as a television or acomputer monitor, a built-in display such as an LCD panel, or may simplyuse a speaker for output. The system 12 may be coupled to or include aninput device 37, such as a keyboard, keypad, mouse, touchpad, pointingdevice, remote control unit, or microphone for receiving commands andinputs from the user. The input device 37, in one embodiment, may beused to change channels on a system with a broadcast TV receiver. Asignal may be received by an interface 100 from an antenna, a satellitereceiver, a cable receiver or a computer network including the Internet,to mention common examples. The data processed by the RF interfaceresource 100 may even be communicated by another application via asoftware programming interface.

An RF interface resource 100, in one embodiment, may be a televisionadd-in card on a PC comprising a tuner, demodulator, demultiplexer ordecoder. Some embodiments may arbitrate the use of these componentsindividually, or in groups of one or more components. An RF interfaceresource 100 may be implemented in hardware, or software or in anycombination of hardware and software.

The system 12 may include an interface 24 that interfaces the system 12with the resources 100. The interface 24, in one embodiment of thepresent invention, may be coupled to a bus 26, in turn, coupled to aninterface 36, that may be a bridge in one embodiment. The interface 36,in one architecture, may be coupled to a storage 28, a processor 40, andthe input device 37. While in one embodiment the output device 16 mayact as the display for the processor-based system 12 and the display formedia, in other embodiments, separate displays may be available. Inaddition, while one architecture for a processor-based system 12 isshown in FIG. 2, the present invention is applicable to any availablearchitecture.

The storage 28, in one embodiment of the present invention, may be ahard disk drive (HDD) or a non-volatile storage device such as flashmemory. The storage 28 may store a plurality of applications 30requiring access to RF interface resources 100. In addition, a resourcearbitration module 32 may also be stored on the storage 28.

In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, contentionbetween applications 30 seeking access to the interfaces 100 may beresolved in an advantageous fashion. This contention may arise becausemultiple applications 30 may wish to access the same RF interfaceresource at the same time so that the number of requests exceeds thecapacity of the system's available resources.

Referring to FIG. 3, the arbitration module 32 controls the ability ofapplications 30 to access the resources 100. The requests for theresources are scheduled as indicated in block 54. A schedule is providedthat reserves given time slots for given resources as requested byvarious applications 30 in accordance with one embodiment of the presentinvention. In one embodiment, applications 30 may be assigned time slotsto access resources needed to receive data that they expect to bebroadcast, for example, based on an available schedule of data servicebroadcasts.

A check at diamond 56 determines whether a conflict exists. A conflictor contention arises when two different applications 30 request accessto a limited number of resources 100 at the same time and the requestednumber of resultant resource usage requests to receive the data servicesexceeds the capacity of the system 10, such as requests to tune to threedifferent television channels by three applications, when only twotelevision tuners are present to mention one common example. Some othercommon example would be conflicting requests over: an HDTV demodulator,an MPEG-2 transport stream demultiplexer, or an MPEG-4 decoder. If noconflict arises, the flow simply grants use of the resource 100according to the prearranged schedule as indicated in block 74.

If a conflict is identified, in accordance with one embodiment of thepresent invention, the arbitration module 32 may issue a request to thevarious applications 30 to indicate their priorities. Alternatively,that priority information may already reside in the arbitration module32 or may be separately accessible by the application 30 from adatabase, or may require prompting of the user to supply information, asadditional examples.

The priority information may be received from the applications 30, inaccordance with one embodiment of the present invention, as indicated inblock 58. In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, aconflict resolution may be devised based on the relative priorities ofdifferent applications 30 as indicated in block 60. For example, in thesituation where two applications 30 are requesting resources in the sametime period and sufficient resources are not available to provide allrequests, the system 10 may allocate the resource based on the priorityof different applications 30. Namely, the application 30 with a higherpriority gets the requested resource, if available.

In such case, the applications 30 that receive the requested resourceare so advised, as indicated in block 62, and those applications whichdid not receive the requested time slots are also apprised. In somecases, responses to the allocation may be received from applications 30in block 64. In such cases, these responses may advise the application30 that while the request was made for a given time slot, theapplication 30 still wants that time slot or some part thereof if itsubsequently becomes available. Also, a given application 30 may advisethe arbitration module 32 that the application 30 may be able to useless than all of the available time that it requested. As still anotheralternative, some applications 30 that receive priority may advise thatthey may be able to yield that priority over a portion of the allocatedtime period.

The circumstances that permit a given application to yield itsallocation are various. As one example, an application may receivesufficient information in less than the entire allocated time period toenable it to achieve the function that it needs to achieve. In suchcase, the application may then yield its allocation after receiving allthe data it needs.

As indicated in block 66, check times are set. The check times are timesdeveloped based on the application responses to re-check if anapplication that received the allocation may be able to yield all orpart of the allocated resource. Even though the contention may beresolved by assigning the resource based on priority, a recheck may havebeen requested by an application to determine whether anotherapplication subsequently can yield its allocated resource. As oneexample, in some cases, the same content may be repeatedly broadcast. Anapplication 30 may therefore receive the information it intended toaccess in a given time slot, at an earlier time and therefore may bewilling thereafter to yield its resource allocation.

A check at diamond 68 determines whether a check time has arisen. Thecheck time may correspond to the time of the resource contention or maybe slightly before or even after that time.

At block 70, when the check time has arrived, a request for yield may beprovided to the higher priority application, as indicated in block 70.If the yield request is granted, the schedule may then be revised asindicated in block 72. Thereafter the interface 14 is operated accordingto the schedule as indicated in block 74.

In some embodiments the arbitration module 32 may be part of anoperating system, layered on top of an operating system, an applicationprogram, or part of an application program interface (API). Examples ofRF interface resources that are arbitrated include a tuner, ademodulator, a modulator, a demultiplexer, a multiplexer, an encoder, adecoder. Encoding and decoding can mean converting data from one formatto another, or converting data from an encrypted format to anunencrypted format. The arbitrated or exclusive use of these resourcesby applications may be controlled individually, as individual resources,or as a combination several components combined into one logicalresource. In some embodiments, it may not make sense to have access tothe tuner, without access to the demodulator, demultiplexer, and decodecomponents as well, hence, they may be bundled together as a singlelogical resource. In other embodiments, it may make sense to keepcomponents separate, to allow concurrent use of all components incertain combinations—e.g. those needed for reception for storage andlater playback, versus those components needed just for playback (ofpreviously recorded content). The granularity or scope of resourcearbitration that would be appropriate depends on the needs and purposesof the particular system and its applications.

Each of the applications 30 may include a module that interconnects withthe arbitration module 32, in accordance with one embodiment of thepresent invention, as shown in FIG. 4. Initially, each application 30forwards a resource request to the arbitration module 32 as indicated inblock 80. Thus, based on available scheduling information, a givenapplication 30 knows that it needs to a resource for a particular timeperiod. Therefore, the application 30 makes the request for thisresource to the arbitration module 32.

Thereafter, the application 30 eventually receives a request forpriority information from the arbitration module 32, if a conflictarises. If no priority request is received then it may be determined,after the passage of time, the request was granted. If a priorityrequest is received, as indicated in diamond 82, the requested priorityinformation may be provided from the application 30 in one embodiment,as indicated in block 84. Thereafter, the resource requestingapplication 30 receives a conflict resolution as determined in diamond86.

If the request is unsatisfied, as indicated in diamond 88, a yield maybe requested in some cases as indicated in block 90. For example, if theapplication 30 determines that it must have the resource if at allpossible, it can formulate an appropriate yield request to thearbitration agent 32. The application 30 then awaits a decision on theyield request.

Simultaneously, a higher priority resource allocated application mayreceive yield requests from the arbitration agent 32, as indicated inblock 92. If a yield request is received, an application 30 makes ayield decision as indicated in block 94. It then communicates that yielddecision to the arbitration agent 32 as indicated in block 96.

As two examples, an application may yield when it either has processedall the data it needs or the data it still does not have may becommunicated in a future time slot where there are no conflicts. Eithercondition may be known by the potentially yielding application, thesystem 12 or both. For the application to know that it has processed allthe data it needs to, additional metadata, like a data manifest thatlists all the necessary data resources, may be provided. The application30 may have received all of the data it needs as determined from themanifest, and the data may be communicated repeatedly. Metadata may alsoindicate what data is essential, which data is optional and which isavailable by other means. As an example, a video on demand applicationmay not yield if it was receiving a movie it knows the user wants, butit may yield if it knows its cache is already full of next week's movietrailers and that is what is being rebroadcast now.

An application 30 (or the system 12 itself) may know that a resource maynot be needed until a future time due to the availability of schedulinginformation which indicates when data may be communicated. Thisscheduling information may be made available in a variety of fashions,including system information carried in the signal itself, or the use ofelectronic programming guides. Information about what data will becommunicated repeatedly and when may be simply additional metadata thatmay be exposed to the application or system in order to determinewhether a yield can happen.

In FIG. 5, depicting one embodiment, there are three data services X, Yand Z being offered on three different physical channels A, B and Cwhich represent three different RF television frequencies. It may beassumed that the time scale covers twenty-four hours and each servicetime period is repeated at the same time every day. It can also beassumed that the system 12 has only one television tuner that can becontrolled exclusively by one application at a time.

If all service applications X, Y and Z start running at system starttime, each service requests the system to tune to its respective channelduring its requested time slot. The service X request would be grantedunconditionally because there are no competing application resourcerequests. The service Y and Z′s request would be handled based on therespective priorities in one embodiment. If service Y has a higherpriority, then its request would be granted unconditionally and thetelevision tuner 14 would be tuned to channel B starting at time T3 foras long as service Y wants the bandwidth up until time T4. Service Zwould not have a chance at the television tuner until time T4 (or soonerif the service Y yields the tuner before then).

If the service Z has a higher priority than the service Y, the platform10 may respond in one of two ways in one embodiment. The platform 10 maytell the service Y that it may tune to channel B until time T5, leavingthe choice of whether to tune there at all to the service Y. The serviceZ would definitely get its data on channel C starting at T5 until T6. Ifthe service Y does not want the tuner as long as it can get it, shortlybefore the time T5, the system may check with service Z to determine ifthe service Z is willing to yield until time T4. If the service Z iswilling to yield, the system may stay tuned to channel B until time T4.If the service Z is not willing to yield, the platform 10 may tune tochannel C at time T5. If the service Z yields the tuner anytime beforetime T4, the system may see if service Y still wants the bandwidth, andif so, turn back to channel B.

While the present invention has been described with respect to a limitednumber of embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate numerousmodifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appendedclaims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within thetrue spirit and scope of this present invention.

1. An article comprising a non-transitory medium storing instructions toenable a processor-based system to: receive first and second requests,respectively from first and second applications, for a radio frequencyinterface resource; determine the first and second requests are forsimultaneous access to the resource; grant the first request, but notthe second request, based on capacity for the resource and adetermination of respective priorities for the first and secondapplications; and determine if the resource can be yielded from thefirst application to the second application.
 2. The article of claim 1including instructions that enable the system to: determine the firstand second requests are for simultaneous access, for a time period, tothe resource; and automatically determine, close in time to onset of thetime period, if the resource can be yielded to the second application.3. The article of claim 1 including instructions that enable the systemto initially receive the first and second requests while the first andsecond applications are active on the system.
 4. The article of claim 1including instructions that enable the system to, while the firstapplication is utilizing the resource, automatically determine if theresource can be yielded to the second application.
 5. The article ofclaim 1 including instructions that enable the system to advise thesecond application of at least one of (a) granting the first request and(b) not granting the second request.
 6. The article of claim 5 includinginstructions that, based on the advice, enable the system to receive aresponse from the second application.
 7. The article of claim 6including instructions that enable the system to, based on the response,request the first application yield the resource to the secondapplication.
 8. The article of claim 1 including instructions thatenable the system to determine if the resource can be yielded to thesecond application based on an additional request from the secondapplication.
 9. The article of claim 1, wherein the resource includes atleast one element selected from the group including a receiver, atransmitter, a transceiver, a tuner, a modulator, a demodulator, amultiplexer, a demultiplexer, an encoder, a decoder, an encrypter, and adecrypter.
 10. The article of claim 1, wherein the system includes oneof a set top box, a personal digital assistant, a desktop computer, aportable computer, a handheld computer, a media server, a media gateway,a mobile phone, and a wireless appliance.
 11. The article of claim 1including instructions that enable the system to determine the priorityfor the second application based on obtaining priority information fromone of a database, the second application, and a user.
 12. The articleof claim 1, wherein at least one of the first and second applicationsperforms functions selected from a group consisting of: TV recording, TVviewing, music radio recording, music radio listening, video contentrecording, video content playback, voice communication, datacommunication, delivery of movies, delivery of music, delivery ofsoftware, delivery of games, delivery of news, and delivery of internetcontent.
 13. The article of claim 1 including instructions that enablethe system to: advise the first application of one of (a) granting thefirst request, and (2) not granting the second request; and based on theadvice, receive a response from the first application indicating thefirst application will yield the resource.
 14. The article of claim 1including instructions that enable the system to: grant the firstrequest, but not the second request, for a time period based on thecapacity for the resource and the determination of respective prioritiesfor the first and second applications; and determine if the resource canbe yielded from the first application to the second application beforethe end of the time period.
 15. The article of claim 1 includinginstructions that enable the system to determine the resource can beyielded from the first application to the second application based onfuture availability of content to be processed by the first application.16. An apparatus comprising: a memory; and a processor, coupled to thememory, to (a) receive first and second requests, respectively fromfirst and second applications, for a radio frequency interface resource;(b) determine the first and second requests are for simultaneous accessto the resource; (c) grant the first request, but not the secondrequest, based on capacity for the resource and a determination ofrespective priorities for the first and second applications; and (d)determine if the resource can be yielded from the first application tothe second application.
 17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein theprocessor is to: determine the first and second requests are forsimultaneous access, for a time period, to the resource; and determine,close in time to onset of the time period, if the resource can beyielded to the second application.
 18. The apparatus of claim 16,wherein the processor is to initially receive the first and secondrequests while the first and second applications are active on aplatform including the processor.
 19. The apparatus of claim 16, whereinthe processor is to: advise the first application of one of (a) grantingthe first request, and (2) not granting the second request; and based onthe advice, receive a response from the first application indicating thefirst application will yield the resource.
 20. The apparatus of claim16, wherein the processor is to: grant the first request, but not thesecond request, for a time period based on the capacity for the resourceand the determination of respective priorities for the first and secondapplications; and determine if the resource can be yielded from thefirst application to the second application before the end of the timeperiod.